<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate learning and Learning 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/06/08/corporate-learning-and-learning-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/06/08/corporate-learning-and-learning-20/</link>
	<description>or, how my graduate studies are affecting my job in corporate education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:23:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gminks</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/06/08/corporate-learning-and-learning-20/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>gminks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=39#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I see them, but I see just as many who don&#039;t see the need for new tools. They say: &quot;We have email, we have message boards, why reinvent the wheel?&quot; 
If I can show them how the tools have made info sharing easier, then they get it. The problem then becomes that the benefit the new improved tools bring is that they give us the ability to share and change and learn together. How can you share if hardly anyone is using those new tools?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I see them, but I see just as many who don&#8217;t see the need for new tools. They say: &#8220;We have email, we have message boards, why reinvent the wheel?&#8221;<br />
If I can show them how the tools have made info sharing easier, then they get it. The problem then becomes that the benefit the new improved tools bring is that they give us the ability to share and change and learn together. How can you share if hardly anyone is using those new tools?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Keefer</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/06/08/corporate-learning-and-learning-20/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Keefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=39#comment-23</guid>
		<description>As I mentioned in a comment on Tony&#039;s blog and even posted on my own, I do not know where all these learners are, as I do not see many of them in corporate or academic settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned in a comment on Tony&#8217;s blog and even posted on my own, I do not know where all these learners are, as I do not see many of them in corporate or academic settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silence and Voice » Blog Archive &#187; Where Is Learning 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/06/08/corporate-learning-and-learning-20/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Silence and Voice » Blog Archive &#187; Where Is Learning 2.0?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=39#comment-22</guid>
		<description>[...] the edublogosphere right now about corporate learning vs. edupunk. I just commented on items that Gina and Tony discussed, with their thoughts partly in response to Jim&#8217;s and recent thinking about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the edublogosphere right now about corporate learning vs. edupunk. I just commented on items that Gina and Tony discussed, with their thoughts partly in response to Jim&#8217;s and recent thinking about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gminks</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/06/08/corporate-learning-and-learning-20/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>gminks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=39#comment-14</guid>
		<description>why does it have to be now !here for training too? Can&#039;t it be !here !now?

And why are you such a geek? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does it have to be now !here for training too? Can&#8217;t it be !here !now?</p>
<p>And why are you such a geek? <img src='http://gminks.edublogs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Brooks</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/06/08/corporate-learning-and-learning-20/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=39#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Back in the day of CSCW, there was (is?) a notion of a matrix consisting of (now, here) (versus, say,  (! now, here), or (! now, ! here)[which, by the way, defines asynchronous distance learning]. The ? is:  where does 2.0 fit in this model? For education, I&#039;d say (! now, ! here): for training, it&#039;s more like (now, ! here). Makes a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the day of CSCW, there was (is?) a notion of a matrix consisting of (now, here) (versus, say,  (! now, here), or (! now, ! here)[which, by the way, defines asynchronous distance learning]. The ? is:  where does 2.0 fit in this model? For education, I&#8217;d say (! now, ! here): for training, it&#8217;s more like (now, ! here). Makes a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
