<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Networks &#8211; CCK08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/09/26/networks-cck08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/09/26/networks-cck08/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gminks</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/09/26/networks-cck08/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>gminks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=88#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I think that is what I&#039;m saying - the network is the connections (being associated) but communities are something more intense as you put it.

Loved the Cthulu quote on your blog -- too true huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is what I&#8217;m saying &#8211; the network is the connections (being associated) but communities are something more intense as you put it.</p>
<p>Loved the Cthulu quote on your blog &#8212; too true huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Webb</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/09/26/networks-cck08/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 23:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=88#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Is the network infrastructure and the community superstructure?  That would be a material/ideal dichotomy, with the network being the technology and the pathways, the community being the people and the content.  

If we are conceiving of both community and network as being made of people (like Soylent Green), then perhaps the network is the larger collectivity, and communities emerge within it through more intense interactions among subsets of the people who make up the network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the network infrastructure and the community superstructure?  That would be a material/ideal dichotomy, with the network being the technology and the pathways, the community being the people and the content.  </p>
<p>If we are conceiving of both community and network as being made of people (like Soylent Green), then perhaps the network is the larger collectivity, and communities emerge within it through more intense interactions among subsets of the people who make up the network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

