<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do you do for a living?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/12/22/what-do-you-do-for-a-living/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/12/22/what-do-you-do-for-a-living/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadKat97</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/12/22/what-do-you-do-for-a-living/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>MadKat97</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 14:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=128#comment-225</guid>
		<description>&quot;girls can&#039;t be in IT&quot; is just way to broad. I&#039;ve known a number of women in IT (at least in software development ... operations may be a different story.) The question to me is: why would a woman choose IT rather than a different line of work? And what&#039;s IT anyway? and here we go again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;girls can&#8217;t be in IT&#8221; is just way to broad. I&#8217;ve known a number of women in IT (at least in software development &#8230; operations may be a different story.) The question to me is: why would a woman choose IT rather than a different line of work? And what&#8217;s IT anyway? and here we go again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gminks</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/12/22/what-do-you-do-for-a-living/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>gminks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=128#comment-224</guid>
		<description>I think your side note gets at what I am thinking of....we&#039;re in the field so we inherently understand that a UNIX admin and the research guy do two different things, but still do &quot;computer stuff&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your side note gets at what I am thinking of&#8230;.we&#8217;re in the field so we inherently understand that a UNIX admin and the research guy do two different things, but still do &#8220;computer stuff&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Spencer</title>
		<link>http://gminks.edublogs.org/2008/12/22/what-do-you-do-for-a-living/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gminks.edublogs.org/?p=128#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I would think that any professional field that requires specialized education and is then a sub-specialization requires a lot of explanation, unless it&#039;s something people interact with every day (say, a doctor, or a dentist).

This is especially true if that education is in the sciences.  Think of the same question being asked of someone who works at CERN.

I think you could certainly make an argument that because these fields are relatively opaque when it comes to the average person, that the average person has little opportunity to be drawn to these fields.  

(As a side note, there are a lot of answers to &quot;what we do&quot; because there are so many of &quot;us.&quot;  A UNIX sysadmin and a pure research guy working on genetic algorithms are both &quot;computer people&quot; to their families, but we know very well that their education, background, and working environment are different.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think that any professional field that requires specialized education and is then a sub-specialization requires a lot of explanation, unless it&#8217;s something people interact with every day (say, a doctor, or a dentist).</p>
<p>This is especially true if that education is in the sciences.  Think of the same question being asked of someone who works at CERN.</p>
<p>I think you could certainly make an argument that because these fields are relatively opaque when it comes to the average person, that the average person has little opportunity to be drawn to these fields.  </p>
<p>(As a side note, there are a lot of answers to &#8220;what we do&#8221; because there are so many of &#8220;us.&#8221;  A UNIX sysadmin and a pure research guy working on genetic algorithms are both &#8220;computer people&#8221; to their families, but we know very well that their education, background, and working environment are different.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
