Archives for women in tech

Just home from the Simmons Women’s Leadership Conference

I was able to attend the Simmons Women’s Leadership Conference courtesy of EMC’ Office of Diversity. It was wonderful. I connected with a Senior Manager from my part of the world (Florida), ladies from RSA, ladies from our IT and Shared Services depts.

I also spent alot of time with fellow EMC blogger Polly Pearson.

I have some video I need to edit, and some better coverage of the conference, but I am still processing some of the things I heard. I tagged my tweets with #swlc, so did other EMC ladies. Check it out in a twitter search.

As a preview for what I’ll blog about…there were a couple of speakers that really got to me. One speaker talked about leading but talked as if the world is flat and we all communicate and listen on the same frequency. And an amazing Southern woman put a spotlight on why culture and family and community matter so very much.

Ada Lovelace Day (better late than never!)

Yesterday was Ada Lovelace Day. I was supposed to write a blog post about a woman in technology that I admire. But schoolwork and end of the quarter work overwhelmed me, and I am a day late with this post.

I decided to write about one woman I’ve worked with and one of EMC’s Distinguished Engineers.

I worked with Janice LeBlanc at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. When I worked with her, Janice knew more about Sendmail than anyone I have ever met. She even caught errors in the O’Reilly Sendmail books. She was very methodical about finding small details, and following them back up to till she found the problem being presented to the user. I really learned alot from her, and I think how I troubleshoot now is probably drawn from things I learned from her.

Patricia Florissi is the one of the senior technical women at EMC. She holds a PhD in computer science, and she is EMC’s only female Distinguished Engineer. I’ve never heard her present, but anyone who ever has talks about the amazing way she presents complex technical information so that everyone can understand it. I’ve had the chance to interact with her a few times. Dr Florissi is smart and very technical but she is also very approachable and encouraging.

I wish I would have had the time before this post to ask her how she got to the place she is now, and what sort of advice she’d give women just starting out in their career. Maybe that will be a follow-up post.

So even though Ada Lovelace Day has passed us by, and especially if you are a technical woman, share with others the technical women who inspire you. We do need that encouragement. It is hard when you are the only woman in your class, the only woman in the lab, the only woman in the department. Maybe the more we can realize that there are others out there just like us, the easier it will be to believe that we really are doing the jobs we were born to do.

Will the promise of being in a “sexy, hot” field attract more kids to tech?

Here is the tweet that started it:

what are \

That twitter conversation was sparked by this Details article about the so-called Playboys of Tech (my daughter calls these sorts of guys hipsters…). Chrissie was annoyed that there are never any articles about hipster tech women.

But that sentiment of that tweet – that somehow typical tech women are not gorgeous and hot – really rubbed me the wrong way. It led to a conversation about how maybe if we made the tech field look hot and exciting and sexy we could attract more girls to the field.

Of course my friend Dave Spencer had to jump in and say that it’s important to make the field look cool for boys too. He gave the example of the nerds in Jurassic Park. Of course he’s right, we need to make the tech field attractive to kids of all genders. But does attractive always have to equal sexy and hot?Jurassic Park

I have two kids. One is 21, and one is 19. I never pointed to examples of cool, sexy people doing any type of job. I encouraged them to do what really interests them deep down. Neither one of them is interested in tech like I am. Both of them have quite the technical aptitude, but it’s just not what they love to do. It looks like one is going to be an author. The other one is in his sophomore year at college pursuing a communications degree, and his dearest dream is to be a comic book author. I hope he can find a way to do that.

I have two nieces who are teenagers. The amount of sexy, hotness that they are inundated with is incredibly amazing. Both are very brand conscious. I think one is way more boy-crazy than the other, but that may just be because she is very shy. They are both math whizzes. So when I see them, I try not to reinforce what the media tells them everyday: be a cute girl, get the hot guy.

I ask them what they are into, how their grades are, what they are going to do in the summer, ask them about how they are going to do all the things that really truly interest them. I try to be the good aunt and try to illuminate the path to womanhood by reminding them to think about who they are inside. Their parents are great about that too, keeping them proud about being so dang smart at math.

I have to wonder where the math gene came from, because I don’t have it. Probably they both got it from their moms, not my brothers. :)

They are both very cute, they will turn into beautiful women. This is a given. But how do we help them turn themselves into strong women who don’t rely on how people respond to their outer beauty for their self-esteem?

Instead of holding up superficial things to foster their interests, I think instead we should be fostering their minds, reminding them it’s important to be smart and investigate what really interests them. There are several places that already offer support for this:

  • The Education group (my group!) at EMC sponsors a Summer STAR program each summer. It is designed to show teenagers what they need to think about to succeed in business.
  • The Systers groups have been around for a long time with the goal of supporting technical women in business.
  • The Anita Borg Institute has a charter to connect women in technology. I love their focus:
    “We are women technologists. We use technology to connect our communities. We create technology because it is who we are — intelligent, creative and driven. We lead with compassion and a belief in inclusion. We develop competitive products and find solutions to problems that impact our lives, our nation, our world. Together, through the Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology (ABI), we are inventing a better future. Working with men that believe in our mission, we are changing the world for women and technology.”
    They sponsor the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women and Computing, which actually starts today. Maybe this conference needs a little more attention, so it drowns out the silly hipster geekboy article?

What do you think? Do you think promoting the tech field as someplace where all the “hot” and “sexy” people work will accomplish the goal of getting more kids to want to be in tech?

– I edited this to add the link to the Summer Star Program. gmm

Page 3 of 3:« 1 2 3